Searcy Annexation Plan |
City's growth
worries its own
Council approves annexation plan despite
protests
LaForce: Gum Springs not in annexation area
Residents unload on annexation: City
officials say fears unfounded
Annexation plan will go to Council, voters: Boundary committee finalizes recommendation MAP
Jun 11, 2004
The Daily Citizen
An ad-hoc group formed to consider expanding the City of Searcy's boundaries voted Wednesday to annex broad expanses of land to the north, west and south of the city. The recommendation, the group's final, will be considered by the City Council in July and will be placed before the voters in November.
On May 19, the group dropped property west of Honey Hill Road from its proposal after property owners Wayne Stroup and Pat Garrett objected. But that area was put back into the proposal Wednesday.
Residents south of Booth Road had likewise objected, but the final proposal stretches the area to be annexed to 1,320 feet south of the road, twice the distance considered at the previous meeting.
And while the group discussed the minute details of shifting the city's external boundary line to one side or another of streets and around small properties, it voted without comment on the most significant - and most costly - change: a giant hole in the proposed city map that corresponds exactly with the Searcy Country Club.
The committee voted on May 19 to include both the country club and the Elk's Lodge in the proposal it would submit to the City Council. No public meeting was held in the interim, but on Wednesday the group was presented with, and voted to approve, a map that excluded both establishments from the proposal.
No explanation was given for the change.
"I can't recall who suggested that we omit that," said Steve Jordan, chair of the group. "But it was felt that it just complicated matters."
"People in Searcy are pretty conservative," said Doug Faith, a member of both the City Council and the annexation group. "And there are probably some people who would think that once the city takes in a liquor license, it's a slippery slope. Maybe a restaurant will apply for a private club permit. And that's enough to give them a reason to vote against this. So why give people a reason to vote against it?"
But omitting the private clubs from the annexation proposal also omits the potential for two large sales tax generators to add to city coffers, an issue that wasn't discussed at the meeting.
At the end of the meeting, Mayor Belinda LaForce suggested that the group hold a public hearing to explain its proposal, and to hear any objections before the matter is considered by the City Council. No date has been set for the hearing.
If approved by the Council without changes, and if approved by the voters, the new city boundaries will be as follows: